Home > Uncategorized > Peaceful Sucession

Peaceful Sucession

The peaceful relinquishment of power is something that has been sought after by mankind ever since… since… well ever since humans have held power over each other. We do a damned good job with this in the US, actually, most democratic countries do a nice job. It hasn’t always been so in this world.

Violence: The basest method for picking a head of state (a state of 3 or 3 billion) is, of course, violence. Works great, by the way. I’m not endorsing violence as a good means for the allocation of political power, merely commenting on it’s effectiveness. There can be no ambiguity about who the winner is when all of the other contenders are pushing up daisies. The two most common forms were probably war or single combat. At least with the latter the violence has tended to be isolated too only those vying to rule. Many a king won his crown on the battlefields of history, and there is no reason to think that the same thing won’t happen well into the future.

Heredity: Another extremely common system, however, as even the most limited review of history will show you, women often cause problems for these systems. I think it is safe to assume that much of what women have suffered in the way of oppression, sexual in particular, has it’s roots in hereditary rule, women almost have to face some oppression for hereditary succession to be a stable and peaceful to any degree. The reason is quite logical, when the right to rule is tied to membership in a bloodline, paternity is vastly important. While there are other things that can also upset monarchies, the by far the most common is illegitimacy, be it a bastard or the result of queenly infidelity. It’s hard to challenge or doubt who the mother of a child is, but near enough impossible to prove the father without the ability to test DNA. Of course I have to add another disclaimer here, I’m not trying to justify any kind of oppression, merely pointing out one of the main considerations with this particular system, that sperm, not men, not women, make peace.

(The individual ability, or inability, to lead is a common problem also, but that goes without saying so I didn’t waste my/your time)

Election: Obviously we like this one and it tends to have a peaceful outcome, though not always. I’ll touch on two big issues here, though there are more, as with the above systems. The first is vote tampering. Actually, there doesn’t even need to be any vote tampering for vote tampering to mess everything up. The reason is that the perception of corruption is as bad, if not worse, than there actually being corruption. The very nature of the secret ballot means that ballot manipulation is hard, if not impossible to discover, and just like witchcraft at various times in the past, perception is reality, witches are a very real danger if you perceive them to be so. Voter registration and ID are both valid safeguards, with or without the presence of fraud.

The second is mob rule. When a simple majority is the way a leader is chosen, the liberties of the minority are always at risk. Most often this pops up during times of strife and public outcry. There are certain countermeasures which may be taken, and are. In America, we have the Electoral College, in many other places you have the similar system of the legislature picking the big cheese (UK). In both cases, there is a degree of separation between voters and the choosing of a person to assume command of the government. We also have strong checks and balances in the US, where we have a relatively weak head of state, at least in some regards.

There are others, but those are the big ones. I’m mentioning all of this because we may well see Obama lose his job on Tuesday. If that is the case, we will all proudly watch, without regard to who we voted for, as Mitt Romney is sworn in on January 20th. We will all watch proudly because our rivers will not run red with blood, shots will not ring out, insurrection will not spring up, the sky, it won’t fall. President Obama will be there on the platform, he will shake hands with the now President Romney, he will get into a vehicle, perhaps a helicopter, and he will swing by the White House to make sure he didn’t leave his cell charger plugged into the wall in the Oval Office.

We will all have witnessed a rare event, though most won’t know it, what has been so rare in history has become such commonplace that no one will think it interesting. No paper will report it, no cable or broadcast news anchor will mention it, no Facebook statuses will be changed to declare it. Doubtless the vast majority of those who have held power, and those who have been subject to it, throughout the ages would look on stunned and amazed if they were here.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. 2012/11/05 at 18:13

    I always enjoy reading posts celebrating the peaceful transfer of power we’ve achieved. I’m glad to see people appreciate that there is more to democracy than the ‘will of the people’ – and that said will can even be dangerous.

    Spot on that the perception of corruption is often as bad as the corruption itself. The system works because the electorate (us) believe that it works. As soon as we think that it doesn’t work, every elected representative could be illegitimate and the system slowly breaks down.

  2. 2012/11/06 at 02:21

    Obama didn’t do anything when he was touring the damage from Sally. There was no use whatsoever in him showing up. He, or his staff, judged that the symbolism, the appearance, ‘optics’ as Rush says, were to some benefit, either to his reelection bid, the actual people impacted by the storm, or both.

    Personally if I was one of the people dealing with the damage, either as a rescue worker or a victim, I would have preferred Obama to stay in Washington. All work had to stop while he was there, police that might be better used elsewhere had to support his tour, streets get blocked off, rescue workers get frisked, etc. etc.

    In the immediate aftermath of Katrina, Bush stayed the hell away, he flew over, rather than touching down and poking around. He took some flak over that, but I feel it was the right way to do things.

    I don’t mean to say Obama’s visit to NJ was intentionally disruptive or pure politicking, though it might have been. I just feel that the symbolic impact of the visit was less valuable than the resources expended to support it.

    When it come to elections, the same sort of math needs doing. How many restrictions on voters are worth how much in actual utility and appearances? Voter ID, restricting/ending same day registrations, restricting/ending absentee voting, etc, etc. They are all valid policies, but I only support voter ID because I don’t see the others as very valuable. One cannot forget the Electoral College though, the most effective bulwark against voter fraud ever devised by mankind.

    Good to hear from you!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: