Home > Uncategorized > A Gay President?

A Gay President?

Race, sexuality, socioeconomic background and gender, I hear too much about it. I don’t honestly care about any of it, but everyday I hear it.

We do not need a gay president and we didn’t need a black one. We still don’t. You can see how electing a black president turned out! As it happens he is just as inept and blundering as any white man could ever hope to be.Who could have guessed? First’s can still be worsts.

Pay attention to guy in the middle.

Barack Obama didn’t, himself, necessary run as a black president, but he was run as one. It may not be the case, but I’d be willing to bet there were many people who voted for him based on the color of his skin and not on the, ahem, content of his character.

Being black or a woman or even gay does not count, and should not count as a qualification for being elected to anything, but sadly it seems to, with potentially disastrous results.

The man in the middle, whoever he is, hit the nail on the head. Myself I wouldn’t vote for a gay man or woman to be president. I just don’t want to know because I fail to see what that has to do with anything. I want to know where they stand on certain issues and God forbid I hear anything about them wanting to be the ‘first’ that’s when I choose another candidate.

I would vote for a black, gay, female in a wheelchair and sporting a hair lip if they mirrored my views on what I really care about. I just wish more Americans would take the same view of things when they head into the ballot box.

These elected positions are not there for social justice, they are not subject to affirmative action or any other race or gender or any other discriminatory policy.

As Scott Brown said: “Well, with all due respect, it’s not the Kennedy’s’ seat, and it’s not the Democrats’ seat, it’s the people’s seat…”

An office does not belong to a race or creed, the people decide. Hopefully they decide on substance rather than immutable characteristics.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. 2010/12/22 at 10:55

    There’s an expression for this I’m try to get into circulation. “Manifest history.” It’s the idea that we haven’t had a person from Group X as president before, so if someone from Group X runs we should vote for them because it will be a historic first. It’s rather silly and it’s not a recipe for electing the best candidates.

  2. 2010/12/22 at 15:24

    It might be better to select the president the way we pick our juries. Randomly and on pain of punishment!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: